
In a letter sent to credit rating agency Fitch Ratings, six public advocacy groups with members throughout California criticized efforts by Westlands Water District to market revenue bonds for a controversial water contract that remains unenforceable. Westlands, the nation’s largest agricultural water district, delivers roughly twice as much water as the residents of the City of Los Angeles use in a year, chiefly to large agribusiness interests on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.
The district, much of whose land is laced with selenium, is plagued with unresolved drainage problems and a history of violations of environmental and securities laws. The groups sending the letter are the California Water Impact Network, AquAlliance, the Planning and Conservation League, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Environmental Water Caucus, and Southern California Watershed Alliance.
Westlands, closely tied to Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, the district’s former lobbyist, seeks to impose a new agreement with the federal government that would make its time-limited water contract permanent. When efforts at a deal were announced last fall, commentators widely panned the proposal. An editorial in the San Jose Mercury News described it as a “sleazy” deal risking the health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and needs of other water users.
The advocacy groups’ new letter to the rating agency warns that Westlands’ new proposed permanent contract, signed in late February without full public disclosure, would “have profound consequences for water users, protected species, ratepayers, and consumers from the Trinity River watershed through the Delta and beyond.” The contract is not simply