
In all of the intense media coverage of the Oroville Dam spillway fiasco over the past month, the mainstream media haven’t yet discussed the real issue behind the disaster: corporate control of California water politics.
The reason why state officials and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ignored a previous warning by Friends of the River, the Sierra Club and the South Yuba River Citizens League that the emergency spillway is not armored (concrete reinforced) and extensive erosion would take place if the emergency spillway was used is not just because of incompetence or negligence.
I believe it is because Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown spent all of their energy and money over the past decade into pushing the water bond and Delta Tunnels, rather than repairing and fixing existing infrastructure such as the Oroville Dam spillway, at the behest of corporate agribusiness interests and the Metropolitan Water District.
During and after the Proposition 1 water bond campaign in the fall of 2014, the mainstream media and so-called alternative media refused to report on corporate and billionaire funding for the water bond, Prop. 1. As far as I know, I was one of the few journalists, if not the only one, who reported on this huge story about Big Money domination of the water bond campaign.
Why is this? My belief is that most mainstream media outlets are scared about opening a window into who really controls California and its water, the same type of 1 percenters and corporate interests who own the establishment media.
These are the same media outlets that steadfastly refused to accurately report on the privately funded Marine Life Protection Act Initiative’s creation of questionable marine protected areas in California under the helm of a big oil lobbyist.
November 4, 2017, a key day in recent California water history, will be the third anniversary of the passage of Proposition 1, Governor Jerry Brown’s controversial $7.12 billion water bond. This is the measure that fishing groups, California